Date: Wed, 17 Aug 94 04:30:02 PDT From: Advanced Amateur Radio Networking Group Errors-To: TCP-Group-Errors@UCSD.Edu Reply-To: TCP-Group@UCSD.Edu Precedence: Bulk Subject: TCP-Group Digest V94 #175 To: tcp-group-digest TCP-Group Digest Wed, 17 Aug 94 Volume 94 : Issue 175 Today's Topics: dial on jnos110f Linux and AX.25 Need DAMA spec or the New Flexnet Duplex_DAMA Spec wnos makefile shit ? Send Replies or notes for publication to: . Subscription requests to . Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu. Archives of past issues of the TCP-Group Digest are available (by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives". We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 1994 06:11:17 -0600 (MDT) From: Klarsen Subject: dial on jnos110f To: "Brian A. Lantz" On Mon, 15 Aug 1994, Brian A. Lantz wrote: > On Mon, 15 Aug 1994, Dana Myers wrote: > > > Karl Larsen wrote: > > > > > > Brian thank you for your very infomative but totally un-readable > > > file. I am somewhat of a linguest but it looks not like any language I > > > have ever seen. > > > > > > Further, if you plan on sending me dialer.c please save your time > > > since I have that in english already. > > > > > > -karl > > > > What's with the snide tone of this reply? > > > > Oh well, here's a un-uuencoded version of the file: > > I'm sorry! PARDON ME, for using Internet MIME format in a message to > TCP-GROUP!! I won't let it happen again! > > I, too, am wondering about the "snide tone"! > > Just tried to help (that was my mistake, obviously).... > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Brian A. Lantz/KO4KS brian@lantz.cftnet.com Brian and Dana Myers I appologise for picking on the hand's that are feeding me but it was very irritating to go back to Phil's early work so that I could understand how dialer.c works. I have some useful information to give everyone. Last night I found my floppy with jnos version 1.04 and just copied dialer.c from that version to my c:\borlandc\bin directory which has the source code for jnos version 1.10f loaded. I compiled the new nos.exe using dialer.c from 1.04 and it compiled without any problems. I could find no side effects in a quick check and that version has been running for 8 hours now. Using Dana Myers script somewhat modified to my conditions worked just fine with net.exe. I then loaded the true jnos 1.10f and did it again. It worked but the stuff displayed on the screen was all messed up! You will go nuts trying to trouble-shoot a dialer script with version 1.10f. Then I compiled my version 1.10f using the version 1.04 dialer.c and tested it. It worked much faster than the true 1.10f and the screen display was exactly what I saw with net.exe! So if you plan to use slip and dialer with nos I can tell you that you want to use dialer.c from jnos 1.04 or such so it will work properly. Dialer.c sent with jnos 1.10f has been currupted some way. And that is why I was short with you Brian. I was trying to make a bad nos work. 73, de karl k5di ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 16 Aug 94 06:11:00 -0000 From: mikebw@bilow.bilow.uu.ids.net (Mike Bilow) Subject: Linux and AX.25 To: tcp-group@ucsd.edu * Original to: UUCP at tcp-group@ucsd.edu CC'd to: bsa@kf8nh.wariat.org, terry@orac.dn.itg.telecom.com.au On 94 Aug 16 at 01:20, Brandon S. Allbery wrote: BSA> +--------------- BSA> MSYS, blerk. Yu'll probably find that you have to ask the MSYS sysop to BSA> add you to a list of known tcp/ip nodes. That's what I had to do here for BSA> an MSYS node. BSA> +------------->8 BSA> Don't blame Mike for that one; he got hounded by a local BSA> sysop who thinks TCP/IP is the Black Plague and *DEMANDED* BSA> in no uncertain terms that TCP/IP be blocked in the BSA> default case or he'd stop supporting MSYS development. BSA> Since said sysop is one of Mike's biggest BSA> supporters/helpers, Mike had little choice but to do it. Nevertheless, it would seem prudent, at a minimum, for MSYS to provide an intelligible message to the telnet client in such situations. It could not be much extra work to send a string of text such as, "Telnet access for your callsign not enabled, contact sysop for access." -- Mike ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 17 Aug 94 08:40:05 EST From: BARRY TITMARSH Subject: Need DAMA spec or the New Flexnet Duplex_DAMA Spec To: LINUX-ACTIVISTS@joker.cs.hut.fi, TCP-GROUP , X-Mn-Key: HAMS Hi all on the groups. Im looking for the DAMA Specifications, I have asked before on various groups but never a reply, My problem is that in Germany the FLEXNET nodes have implemented a new type of dama_master modifyed for duplex operation, this appears different to the original dama spec for simplex Operations. has any one seen the new or old dama specs published, RFC or draft RFC or other Thanks.. Barry. ------------------------------ Date: Tue, 16 Aug 94 16:18:01 EST From: BARRY TITMARSH Subject: wnos makefile shit ? To: ssampson@sabea-oc.af.mil, TCP-GROUP Sorry i dont see your problem if you refer to wnos-9408xx.zip that is uploaded in the past weeks. I and many others use it, as I did say BC++ 2.00 NOT any other version of BC TC or compiler BC++ 2.00 work fine Just edit config.h and type make clean make. So what is the shitty bit in the make file that you find so hard to digest. ? Barry. ------------------------------ End of TCP-Group Digest V94 #175 ******************************